This is an ARTICLE III COURT OF RECORD The EIGHTH CIRCUIT "judges" Raymond Gruender, Duane Benton, and Ralph Erickson of the EIGHTH CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS - being all three members of the "FEDERAL JUDGES ASSOCIATION", which is a member itself of the "foreign entity" of the UNITED NATIONS' and its "INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF JUDGES" following a different "CONSTITUTION" and providing very different "rights" to judges otherwise bound by the terms of ARTICLE III of the U.S. CONSTITUTION - sent me this so-called "Judgment" and Therefore, I filed this PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI with the SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES (SCOTUS) - dated 12/15/21 ("Bill of Rights Day"). This PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI was filed with the following Accompanying Documents: - Cover Letter to the "Clerk of the [SUPREME]COURT" Scott Harris. - CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE - Listing all of the documents and the people "served" relative to this SCOTUS case an the "inextricably intertwined" case of "David Schied v. UNITED STATES, et al", as well as this instant case of "David Schied v. U-HAUL INTERNATIONAL, INC". Proof that ALL DELIVERIES WERE COMPLETED 1-page "Motion for Leave to Proceed in Forma Pauperis" and 5-page "Affidavit/Declaration in Support of Motion. . ." PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI for the case of "David Schied v. UNITED STATES, et al"- also dated 12/15/21 ("Bill of Rights Day") EIGHTH CIRCUIT SEDITION and TREASON In DENYING "Meaningful Access" to the Court by "secondary" RICO Concurrence with the "predicate" RICO CORRUPTION of the Lower (U.S. District Court) activities to "Deprive of Rights Under Color of Law"
FRAUDULENT U.S. DISTRICT COURT (LAWRENCE PIERSOL) "JUDGMENT / SCREENING ORDER OF DISMISSAL" as "frivolous" and having "no facts" Being Appealed
Since this case against U-HAUL INTERNATIONAL, INC. (et al) was summarily dismissed near simultaneously as my second case against the UNITED STATES, et al - in the very same fashion by the very same judicial usurper (Lawrence Piersol) denying me "access to the courts" in both cases, rather than to provide me instead with "reasonable accommodations", as is otherwise required by both codified and customary laws toward "totally and permanently disabled quad-amputees" and other disabled Americans - the details of that second "inextricably intertwined" case against the UNITED STATES, et al were included with this instant case filed with SCOTUS against U-HAUL INTERNATIONAL, INC. The details of that other case of "David Schied v. UNITED STATES, et al" case are located HERE.
The traitorous federal COA "judges" of that other case are named as Jane Kelly, David Stras, and Jonathan Kobes, who are members of the FEDERAL JUDGES ASSOCIATION, which itself is a member of the UNITED NATIONS own INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF JUDGES, which has its own "CONSTITUTION" with various listed "ARTICLES" and "guarantees to the rights of judges worldwide" that have nothing to do with America's U.S. CONSTITUTION and "ARTICLE III" giving legitimacy to the UNITED STATES "JUDICIARY" and the "enunciated rights" of "servant" judges as delivered by the Sovereign American People as the TRUE "government of, by, and for the People of the United States of America".
Additionally, because I was filing as a "forma pauperis" (indigent) litigant, I was required by SCOTUS RULES to file a "Motion" and "Affidavit/Declaration" formally certifying my financial status as such:
DECLARATION IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR LEAVE TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS
MOTION FOR LEAVE TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS
APPENDIX Note that since the costs of providing SCOTUS with the required ten (10) copies of everything was MEANT to be cost-prohibitive, especially to "forma pauperis" and "recently totally and permanently disabled" people like me, the APPENDIX is all referenced online - where my ARTICLE III COURT OF RECORD is located anyway - by embedded links in my PETITIONS for each of the two cases that I filed with SCOTUS. While my "PETITION(s)" for these two cases provides the best references for those links in writing, some of the other resources referenced by these two SCOTUS cases are provided below as follows, as particularly relevant to the case of David Schied v. UNITED STATES, et al.
1) The opinions, orders, findings of fact, and conclusions of law, whether written or orally given and transcribed, entered in conjunction with the judgment sought to be reviewed:
a) EIGHTH CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS "JUDGMENT" (3 sentences) of "concurrence" with and "whitewash over" the lower DISTRICT COURT's "Fraud Upon the Court", while ordering the DISTRICT COURT to "UNSEAL" the "Whistleblower" records of this case that I had initially filed as my "COMPLAINT".
b) FRAUDULENT U.S. DISTRICT COURT (LAWRENCE PIERSOL) "JUDGMENT / SCREENING ORDER FOR DISMISSAL as "frivolous" and with "no facts"" Being Appealed 2) Any other relevant opinions, orders, findings of fact, and conclusions of law entered in the case by courts or administrative agencies, and, if reference thereto is necessary to ascertain the grounds of the judgment, of those in companion cases (each document shall include the caption showing the name of the issuing court or agency, the title and number of the case, and the date of entry) a) My own Common Law ARTICLE III COURT OF RECORD issuance of a "WRIT OF ERROR CORAM NOBIS and CERTIFICATION OF FAULT/DEFAULT JUDGMENT and LEDGER OF [TREBLE] DAMAGES" against the UNITED STATES and other named "CO-TRUSTEES" as being "represented" and "illegally defended" by the "conspiracy team" of the "judicial usurper" Lawrence Piersol and his "Clerk" Matthew Thelen. FOUR (4) PREVIOUS CASES BROUGHT TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES ("SCOTUS") DEPICTING HIGH LEVELS OF FEDERAL COURT CORRUPTION, WHICH WERE ALL "DISMISSED" BY THESE SO-CALLED "ARTICLE III" SUPREME COURT "JUSTICES". Then when given the chance to "Reconsider" the FRAUD called out by me as perpetuated by their own "Court" and "Court Clerk", SCOTUS "DISMISSED" that opportunity too, also by the same pattern and practice of FRAUD. 1) In Re Schied (2011) (SCOTUS Case No. 11-5945) - rooted in the repeated denial of access to a grand jury for reporting the STATE OF MICHIGAN "judges" and STATE BAR OF MICHIGAN "attorneys" - being at the base cause behind the total destruction of an American (Schied) family and a resulting "divorce and child custody" case stemming from Sedition, Treason, Insurrection, and Domestic Terrorism being reported as covering a span of eight years and onward to the present as none of these issues were ever "litigated on the merits", thus denying "meaningful access to the court" in the underlying numerous cases in which the "DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL" and "DEMAND FOR GRAND JURY" were both DENIED. 2) David Schied (on behalf of STUDENT A) v. SCOTT SNYDER, ET AL (as the NORTHVILLE PUBLIC SCHOOL DISTRICT) (2011) (SCOTUS Case No. 11-6015) - being a case of defamation and contract violation, as well as criminal racketeering covering a span of six years and onward to the present as none of these issues were ever "litigated on the merits", thus denying "meaningful access to the court" in the underlying numerous cases in which the "DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL" and "DEMAND FOR GRAND JURY" were both DENIED. 3) David Schied v. Ronald Ward, et al (as the BRIGHTON AREA SCHOOL DISTRICT) (2011) (SCOTUS Case No. 11-5937) - being a being a case of defamation and contract violation, as well as criminal racketeering covering a span of three years and onward to the present as none of these issues were ever "litigated on the merits", thus denying "meaningful access to the court" in the underlying case in which the "DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL" was DENIED. 4) David Schied and Patricia Kraus (acting on behalf of David Schied) v. MIDLAND COUNTY SHERIFF Gerald Nielson, et al (MIDLAND COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT "judges", WAYNE COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT "judges", the CHARTER TOWNSHIP OF REDFORD POLICE DEPARTMENT, and many others) (2012) (SCOTUS Case # 12-10356) - being a "HABEAS CORPUS" case exposing STATEWIDE Sedition, Treason, Insurrection, and Domestic Terrorism being reported as covering a span from one month post "kidnapping" and "false incarceration" and onward to the present as none of these issues were ever "litigated on the merits", thus denying "meaningful access to the court" in the underlying numerous cases in which the "DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL" and "DEMAND FOR GRAND JURY" were both DENIED. FURTHERING RESEARCH COMPILED AND REPORTED IN NOVEMBER 2021 How and Why the Courts and Other 'Branches' of American Governance Got So Corrupted and Appear to Ignore the Constitutional Guarantees of the 'Public Trust'. Letter of Acceptance from the SCOTUS clerk with Docket Number 21-6728 Email Proof of Delivery of Case Docs to U-HAUL INTERNATIONAL, et al "representatives" Matthew Thelen (Clerk) and Lawrence Piersol (judicial usurper) Email Proof of Delivery of "Respondent Letter" to USA, et al "representatives" Matthew Thelen (Clerk) and Lawrence Piersol (judicial usurper) in option to "waive" response on behalf of all named "CO-TRUSTEES" in the case. As a magnanimous courtesy, I even took the extra effort to provide a good faith effort to notify all of U-HAUL INTERNATIONAL's parent corporation - AMERICO's "Board of Directors" and various "Committee" officers - about the lawsuit and about the "representatives" acting on their behalf thus far in "handling" this case on their behalf, being U.S. DISTRICT COURT "Clerk" Matthew Thelen and "judicial usurper" Lawrence Piersol. The SUPREME COURT's unsupported 2/22/22 DENIAL OF CERTIORARI for this case is located HERE.