This is an ARTICLE III COURT OF RECORD - Original District Court Filings: - Evidence of Initial Obstruction by Court Clerk / My Response & Refiling: - Date-Stamped Original Filings: - Objection to Court's Sealing / Motion to Show Cause: - Amendment to Identify DOES 1-17 in OAKLAND COUNTY: On 7/28/21, the U.S. District Court judicial usurper Lawrence Piersol "dismissed" the entirety of my case as submitted above. He did so while barring my "forma pauperis" filings for "service of process" of the "ORIGINAL COMPLAINT" and other filings above via delivery upon the named "Co-Trustees" by the U.S. Marshals Service by labeling my MOTION as "moot" (since he was dismissing the entirety of my documents to effectively bar me from having any "access" to this "fraudulent court" at all. (See the dismissal ruling below) Subsequently, I put the lower (fraudulent) "DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES" on COMMON LAW notice that I did NOT accept this judicial usurper Piersol's criminal actions as an "official" dismissal of my case; that I instead had a determination and "(ORDER OF) DEFAULT JUDGMENT" of my own; and that I was using my constitutionally guaranteed "Right to Redress" to take this case to the EIGHTH CIRCUIT as a "CLAIM of APPEAL". (See the link below) - Schied's Common Law "Writ of Coram Nobis", "Default Judgment", and "Notice of Claim and Appeal": See the link below to the page containing the records of all the "higher" EIGHTH CIRCUIT court activity.
I encourage visitors to this website and ARTICLE III COURT OF RECORD to review the information found by the link above to the activity at the EIGHT CIRCUIT COA. I also encourage the review of over 500 pages of research into "How and Why the Courts Have Gotten So Corrupt", as well as the link below to my filings of this case in the SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES. At the Lower U.S. DISTRICT COURT, the judicial usurper Lawrence Piersol (and his supervisory "chief judge" Roberto Lange) literally brought two cases together that I had otherwise filed separately; and thereafter "dismissed" them both by way of the same CRIMINAL "pattern and practice". The link to that other case -- which thereafter was also treated with in "the same pattern" of "summary dismissal" by the EIGHTH CIRCUIT COA -- was eventually filed in the SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES ("SCOTUS"), like this one, and is linked to this instant case HERE. ALL ACTIVITY AT THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES ("SCOTUS") for this instant case of "David Schied v. UNITED STATES, et alia"
Have you heard this joke? "What do you call 200 BAR-attorneys at the bottom of a lake?"