X
Amendment to Identify DOES 1-17 in OAKLAND COUNTY: (Schied v. USA, et al)
Publish date: 08/15/2021 02:25 PM
Author: Editor

About the time two (2) full months had expired and I still had not received date-stamped copies of my "Objection" and "Motion to Show Cause" and "Demand for Federal Special Grand Jury Investigation" - and had similarly not gotten any UPDATED DOCKET SHEET showing changes to the RECORD that I had similarly demanded on MY case n the ARTICLE III COURT OF RECORD - I filed an "Amendment" to my "ORIGINAL COMPLAINT" identifying the first seventeen (17) of the "DOES 1-30" that I was suing. I also provided full reference to the background FACTS and reasonable ARGUMENTS as to why they were named as "CO-TRUSTEES" being sued by me as the "BENEFICIARY/RELATOR" as the initiator of this case. (See below)


1_IDofDOES#1-17-ALL


2_AddUSMarshalServiceOakCnty+State17


3_ProofofServiceSDFilings


071321_CvrLetr2CLERKonIDof17CO-TRUSTEES

Liberty Bell image
Hold your government accountable to their solemn Oaths to our state and federal constitutions . . . and indict them when necessary!

RICO Busters.com

RICO Buster logo
This is where you'll find spotlighted the domestic terrorists that have usurped the authority and power of "We, The People." Where the rubber meets the road with Evidence for the "jury" that most judicial crime victims never get to see. Here, YOU, as the viewer, play an important role in the "Court of Public Opinion."

DISCLAIMER: The accused perpetrators named, listed or spotlighted by this website are presumed innocent until proven guilty by a competent court of law.

Copyright 2022.  RICO Busters™ name and logo design are trademarked.