This is an ARTICLE III COURT OF RECORD
PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI and Accompanying Documents PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI dated 12/15/21 This PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI was filed with the following Accompanying Documents: - Cover Letter to the "Clerk of the [SUPREME]COURT" Scott Harris. - CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE - Listing all of the documents and the people "served" relative to this SCOTUS case an the "inextricably intertwined" case of "David Schied v. UNITED STATES, et al", as well as this instant case of "David Schied v. U-HAUL INTERNATIONAL, INC". Proof that ALL DELIVERIES WERE COMPLETED 1-page "Motion for Leave to Proceed in Forma Pauperis" and "Affidavit/Declaration in Support of Motion. . . "
FRAUDULENT U.S, DISTRICT COURT (LAWRENCE PIERSOL) "JUDGMENT / OPINION / MEMORANDUM" Being Appealed
These traitorous federal COA "judges" are named as Jane Kelly, David Stras, and Jonathan Kobes, who are members of the FEDERAL JUDGES ASSOCIATION, which itself is a member of the UNITED NATIONS own INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF JUDGES, which has its own "CONSTITUTION" with various listed "ARTICLES" and "guarantees to the rights of judges worldwide" that have nothing to do with America's U.S. CONSTITUTION and "ARTICLE III" giving legitimacy to the UNITED STATES "JUDICIARY" and the "enunciated rights" of "servant" judges as delivered by the Sovereign American People as the TRUE "government of, by, and for the People of the United States of America".
DECLARATION IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR LEAVE TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS
MOTION FOR LEAVE TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS
APPENDIX
1) The opinions, orders, findings of fact, and conclusions of law, whether written or orally given and transcribed, entered in conjunction with the judgment sought to be reviewed:
a) EIGHTH CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS "JUDGMENT" (3 sentences) of "concurrence" with and "whitewash over" the lower DISTRICT COURT's "Fraud Upon the Court", while ordering the DISTRICT COURT to "UNSEAL" the "Whistleblower" records of this case that I had initially filed as my "COMPLAINT".
b) FRAUDULENT U.S, DISTRICT COURT (LAWRENCE PIERSOL) "JUDGMENT / OPINION / MEMORANDUM" Being Appealed
2) Any other relevant opinions, orders, findings of fact, and conclusions of law entered in the case by courts or administrative agencies, and, if reference thereto is necessary to ascertain the grounds of the judgment, of those in companion cases (each document shall include the caption showing the name of the issuing court or agency, the title and number of the case, and the date of entry)
a) My own Common Law ARTICLE III COURT OF RECORD issuance of a "WRIT OF ERROR CORAM NOBIS and CERTIFICATION OF FAULT/DEFAULT JUDGMENT and LEDGER OF [TREBLE] DAMAGES" against the UNITED STATES and other named "CO-TRUSTEES" as being "represented" and "illegally defended" by the "conspiracy team" of the "judicial usurper" Lawrence Piersol and his "Clerk" Matthew Thelen.
FOUR (4) PREVIOUS CASES BROUGHT TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES ("SCOTUS") DEPICTING HIGH LEVELS OF FEDERAL COURT CORRUPTION, WHICH WERE ALL "DISMISSED" BY THESE SO-CALLED "ARTICLE III" SUPREME COURT "JUSTICES". Then when given the chance to "Reconsider" the FRAUD called out by me as perpetuated by their own "Court" and "Court Clerk", SCOTUS "DISMISSED" that opportunity too, also by the same pattern and practice of FRAUD. 1) In Re Schied (2011) (SCOTUS Case No. 11-5945) - rooted in the repeated denial of access to a grand jury for reporting the STATE OF MICHIGAN "judges" and STATE BAR OF MICHIGAN "attorneys" -- being at the base cause behind the total destruction of an American (Schied) family and a resulting "divorce and child custody" case stemming from Sedition, Treason, Insurrection, and Domestic Terrorism being reported as covering a span of eight years and onward to the present as none of these issues were ever "litigated on the merits", thus denying "meaningful access to the court" in the underlying numerous cases in which the "DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL" and "DEMAND FOR GRAND JURY" were both DENIED. 2) David Schied (on behalf of STUDENT A) v. SCOTT SNYDER, ET AL (as the NORTHVILLE PUBLIC SCHOOL DISTRICT) (2011) (SCOTUS Case No. 11-6015) -- being a case of defamation and contract violation, as well as criminal racketeering covering a span of six years and onward to the present as none of these issues were ever "litigated on the merits", thus denying "meaningful access to the court" in the underlying numerous cases in which the "DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL" and "DEMAND FOR GRAND JURY" were both DENIED. 3) David Schied v. Ronald Ward, et al (as the BRIGHTON AREA SCHOOL DISTRICT) (2011) (SCOTUS Case No. 11-5937) -- being a being a case of defamation and contract violation, as well as criminal racketeering covering a span of three years and onward to the present as none of these issues were ever "litigated on the merits", thus denying "meaningful access to the court" in the underlying case in which the "DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL" was DENIED. 4) David Schied and Patricia Kraus (acting on behalf of David Schied) v. MIDLAND COUNTY SHERIFF Gerald Nielson, et al (MIDLAND COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT "judges", WAYNE COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT "judges", the CHARTER TOWNSHIP OF REDFORD POLICE DEPARTMENT, and many others) (2012) (SCOTUS Case # 12-10356) -- being a "HABEAS CORPUS" case exposing STATEWIDE Sedition, Treason, Insurrection, and Domestic Terrorism being reported as covering a span from one month post "kidnapping" and "false incarceration" and onward to the present as none of these issues were ever "litigated on the merits", thus denying "meaningful access to the court" in the underlying numerous cases in which the "DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL" and "DEMAND FOR GRAND JURY" were both DENIED.
FURTHERING RESEARCH COMPILED AND REPORTED IN NOVEMBER 2021
How and Why the Courts and Other 'Branches' of American Governance Got So Corrupted and Appear to Ignore the Constitutional Guarantees of the 'Public Trust'. Letter of Acceptance from the SCOTUS clerk with Docket Number 21-6729 Email Proof of Delivery of Case Docs to USA, et al "representatives" Matthew Thelen (Clerk) and Lawrence Piersol (judicial usurper) Email Proof of Delivery of "Respondent Letter" to USA, et al "representatives" Matthew Thelen (Clerk) and Lawrence Piersol (judicial usurper) in option to "waive" response on behalf of all named "CO-TRUSTEES" in the case. The SUPREME COURT's unsupported 2/22/22 DENIAL OF CERTIORARI for this case is located HERE.