This is an ARTICLE III COURT OF RECORD

SEE FURTHER BELOW for separate links to the documents of each of the four cases depicted immediately below:

FOUR (4) PREVIOUS CASES BROUGHT TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES ("SCOTUS") DEPICTING HIGH LEVELS OF FEDERAL COURT CORRUPTION, WHICH WERE ALL "DISMISSED" BY THESE SO-CALLED "ARTICLE III" SUPREME COURT "JUSTICES". Then when given the chance to "Reconsider" the FRAUD called out by me as perpetuated by their own "Court" and "Court Clerk", SCOTUS "DISMISSED" that opportunity too, also by the same pattern and practice of FRAUD.

1) IN RE SCHIED (2011) (SCOTUS Case No. 11-5945) - rooted in the repeated denial of access to a grand jury for reporting the STATE OF MICHIGAN "judges" and STATE BAR OF MICHIGAN "attorneys" -- being at the base cause behind the total destruction of an American (Schied) family and a resulting "divorce and child custody" case stemming from Sedition, Treason, Insurrection, and Domestic Terrorism being reported as covering a span of eight years and onward to the present as none of these issues were ever "litigated on the merits", thus denying "meaningful access to the court" in the underlying numerous cases in which the "DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL" and "DEMAND FOR GRAND JURY" were both DENIED.

2) David Schied (on behalf of STUDENT A) v. SCOTT SNYDER, ET AL (as the NORTHVILLE PUBLIC SCHOOL DISTRICT) (2011) (SCOTUS Case No. 11-6015) -- being a case of defamation and contract violation, as well as criminal racketeering covering a span of six years and onward to the present as none of these issues were ever "litigated on the merits", thus denying "meaningful access to the court" in the underlying numerous cases in which the "DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL" and "DEMAND FOR GRAND JURY" were both DENIED.

3) David Schied v. Ronald Ward, et al (as the BRIGHTON AREA SCHOOL DISTRICT) (2011) (SCOTUS Case No. 11-5937) -- being a being a case of defamation and contract violation, as well as criminal racketeering covering a span of three years and onward to the present as none of these issues were ever "litigated on the merits", thus denying "meaningful access to the court" in the underlying case in which the "DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL" was DENIED.

4) David Schied and Patricia Kraus (acting on behalf of David Schied) v. MIDLAND COUNTY SHERIFF Gerald Nielson, et al (MIDLAND COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT "judges", WAYNE COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT "judges", the CHARTER TOWNSHIP OF REDFORD POLICE DEPARTMENT, and many others) (2012) (SCOTUS Case # 12-10356) -- being a "HABEAS CORPUS" case exposing STATEWIDE Sedition, Treason, Insurrection, and Domestic Terrorism being reported as covering a span from one month post "kidnapping" and "false incarceration" and onward to the present as none of these issues were ever "litigated on the merits", thus denying "meaningful access to the court" in the underlying numerous cases in which the "DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL" and "DEMAND FOR GRAND JURY" were both DENIED.

CASE FILINGS for #1: In Re David Schied (2011) --

10/31/2011 - DENIAL by the SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES (SCOTUS Case# 11-5945) of BENEFICIARY-RELATOR's previous SWORN (under "penalty of perjury") PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS and SUPPORTING APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE, which was accompanied by two other cases for Writ of Certiorari, each also supported by mounds of EVIDENCE (by two more additional APPENDIXES) showing the number of ways that PRIVATE, PUBLIC PROXY was then "blowing the whistle" on STATE and UNITED STATES "prosecutorial abuses" and "judicial misconduct" and his being for the previous several years (since 2003) "targeted" for CRIMES by "government" agents otherwise engaged in illegal "Critical Race Theory" and "Cancel Culture"activities. These were activities carried out by "The Accused" perpetrators while they were also engaging in RICO crime syndicates, Insurrection against the U.S. CONSTITUTION and MICHIGAN CONSTITUTION, and SEDITION and TREASON through DOMESTIC TERRORIST activities. These THREE cases appearing before SCOTUS but DENIED any proper address by SCOTUS, are depicted below in their entirety:

In Re David Schied (SCOTUS Case No. 11-5945): PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS -

A) PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS

B) SUPPORTING APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE

C) EXHIBITS OF EVIDENCE referenced along with the APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE

Initial Filings for this case (and other two cases) in the SCOTUS in 2011:

MOTION FOR PERMISSION TO FILE PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS IN FORMA PAUPERIS - This document explains the basis for David Schied having been rendered a financial pauper as having filed a plethora of compounding "formalized crime reports -- most sworn and notarized and all referencing State and Federal laws as well as the evidence of the crimes -- [whereby in response] "the government officials 'discretionarily' refused to act, depriving my family and me of numerous rights, including the right to criminal protection from 'the accused', the right to 'due process' of a proper handling of these criminal matters through use of the Michigan and United States Code(s) (of criminal procedures), and to 'honest government services'".

NOTE: This document contains explanations for eight (9) listed EXHIBITS (provided below by the next link) showing the numerous CRIME REPORTS delivered to both the corrupt STATE OF MICHIGAN prosecutors and Attorney General Bill Schuette (associated also with the population poisoning crimes of the "FLINT WATER CRISIS") to the U.S. ATTORNEY(S) and U.S. DISTRICT COURT for the EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN, to the U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL Eric Holder (associated with the "FAST AND FURIOUS" U.S. gun smuggling operation to MEXICO that led to Eric Holder being forced to quit by his malfeasance leading to these guns linked to the deaths of U.S. Border Patrols). As EXHIBIT #8 (below) additionally indicates, Eric Holder's predecessor to the USAG's office - Michael Mukasey - was also made aware of similar CRIME REPORTS under the BUSH (PRESIDENTIAL) ADMINISTRATION prior to Holder being appointed by Barack Obama (a.k.a. "Barry Sortero") to head up the prosecutorial ABUSES of the OBAMA ADMINISTRATION.

EIGHT EXHIBITS OF EVIDENCE supporting the above "Motion for ... Forma Pauperis"

CASE FILINGS for #2: David Schied (on behalf of STUDENT A) v. SCOTT SNYDER, ET AL (2011) (SCOTUS Case No. 11-6015) -

David Schied EX REL acting on behalf of "STUDENT A" v. Scott Snyder, Lynn Mossoian, Kenneth Roth, Richard Fanning, Jr., David Soebbing, Harvalee Saunto, Donna Paruszkiewicz, Mary Fayad, Susan Liebetreu, Donald Yarab, Catherine Anderle, Arne Duncan, in both their individual and official capacities" (SCOTUS Case No. 11-6015): PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI - -

A) PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI

B) More SUPPORTING APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE to Petition for WRIT OF CERTIORARI (Student A v. Scott Snyder, et al)

C) SCOTUS "DENIAL OF CERTIORARI" - Showing that all of the above meticulously compiled EVIDENCE of SEDITION and TREASON by both the "Judicial" and "Executive" BRANCHES of government at the "State" and "Federal" levels means nothing to the traitorous "BAR members" of this "UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT".

In following all of the brainless "Rules of the Supreme Court" for filing with a "status" as a PAUPER, I was compelled to file duplicate "DECLARATION IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR LEAVE TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS" forms for each of the two cases accompanying the "PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS". These were simply more "hoops" to jump through in effort by government to dissuade me from exercising my FIRST AMENDMENT guarantee to a "Redress of Grievance" through the only "public" venue being made available to me in dealing with PROSECUTORIAL DERELICTION and (CRIMINAL) GROSS NEGLIGENCE at the STATE and UNITED STATES offices of "Attorney General" (and U.S. Attorneys).

Because all of this takes time and in 2011, I was like every other red-blooded sovereign American man trying to support a family (though then also getting a divorce from my learning disabled wife so she would no longer be so negatively affected by my continued "fight" against what I was finding as Sedition and Treason by "government actors"). So, because of the costs of time biting into my then busy schedule, I was also compelled to file "MOTION(s) TO EXTEND TIME FOR FILING"... my two "Petitions" for "WRIT OF CERTIORARI" in each of these two other cases. Those "Motions" - along with their accompanying additional EXHIBITS OF EVIDENCE - are to be found below along with what I was compelled to file "in Forma Pauperis".

All I was trying to get by these 2011 efforts was to have the question answered, "Who can a Sovereign American 'citizen' go to when reporting CRIMES by "sworn" government officials when these government "servants to the People" refuse to even acknowledge the EVIDENCE of the crimes, much less adjudicate or prosecute them against one another; and when both the 'Judicial' and 'Executive' branches of government refuse to provide ACCESS to the REAL 'government of, by, and for the People' by way of helping me to reach a JURY and/or GRAND JURY for issuing 'final' decisions in these matters after 'hearing' my testimonies and evidence?" Each time I am provided one more of the countless "due process" doors to go through -- as shown by my "pleadings" and "COMPLAINTS" -- I have used these opportunities to load so much EVIDENCE that the "reviewing" government officials have no wiggle room for "affirmatively" claiming they "didn't know" about, or have the evidence of, these crimes in their own hands, as I had long been reporting to them for affirmative action in accordance with their OATHS and DUTIES to "faithful performance".

A) MOTION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE for the case of Schied ("on behalf of Student A") v. Scott Snyder, et alia, (SCOTUS Case #11-6015)

B) APPENDIX OF REFERENCED EXHIBITS in accompaniment to the MOTION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE.

C) Clerk's NOTICE OF GRANTING MOTION showing "Justice" Elena Kagan had granted the "extension of time" on the "Student A" case for 60 days making this case "Certiorari" filing due on 6/18/11.

D) My "NOTICE OF APPEAL and [accompanying] MOTION FOR PERMISSION TO APPEAL IN FORMA PAUPERIS" as filed on 4/11/11 with the SCOTUS as it pertained to the PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI on this case of "Schied [on behalf of 'Student A'] vs Scott Snyder, et al"

CASE FILINGS FOR #3 David Schied v. Ronald Ward, et al (2011) (SCOTUS Case No. 11-5937) --

STILL TO BE UPLOADED from storage boxes - It is believed that this box was destroyed by animals in storage or lost in transit between moves. All underlying federal cases to this "appeal" have been located however and will be preserved digitally in due course of time.

11/21/11 - After receiving "DENIAL" letters back from the SCOTUS "clerk" that did not have the official "SEAL" of the Court authenticating the action of "denial" as anything "official" as is otherwise required by law under federal codes, I prepared a "PETITION FOR REHEARING OF DENIAL" for all of these three cases from 2011. I submitted my documents as required by SCOTUS "rules" in a quantity of ten (10) and also sent additional copies to EACH of the attorneys for the "government" criminals that I had long been suing, to no avail. Of course, this was a very costly endeavor. The files I boxed in duplicates of ten (10) were provided to SCOTUS as follows in a total of 176 as just one copy:

PETITION FOR REHEARING OF DENIAL

SCOTUS Date-Stamped Cover Page showing that my filing was received on 11/21/11.

A month after my submission and during the CHRISTMAS holidays, the SCOTUS "Clerk of the Court" William Suter had an agent of his office "S. Elliot" send back all of my "Rehearing" filings with the instruction that I should need to refile everything within fifteen (15) days as THREE SEPARATE "Petitions". (The normal practice of these SATAN WORSHIPERS - including in the instant case in 2021 - is to spoil the Christian holiday spirit to be forced to direct attention to these SECULAR events instead.)

12/22/21 Letter from SCOTUS Clerk William Suter

On 12/30/11, I sent back to SCOTUS my documents, again in duplicates of one for EACH case being "petitioned" for "rehearing"; while also sending copies of each again to EACH of the government attorneys that I was suing. In my package to SCOTUS Clerk William Suter, I not only sent the three separated "PETITIONS" presented herein below, I also sent to SCOTUS - via "Certified Mail Delivery" by the USPS - a very important "LEGAL NOTICE AND DEMAND". The public of We, The People really should read this comprehensive document. This added document put the SCOTUS - as a "principal" for the UNITED STATES - on clear notice that, not only did I "not consent" to being under their CORPORATE jurisdiction, but that I was also placing NOTICE that all of my CLAIMS OF DAMAGES were "in commerce" (past, present and future), and that their silence was "acquiescence" in TACIT AGREEMENT with the terms of this NEW CONTRACT with the UNITED STATES. This document has for the past ten (10) years served as the legitimate and contractual basis for my CLAIMING in 2021 a debt by the UNITED STATES to me of minimally $918 BILLION ($918,000,000,000.00) as of December 2021.

LEGAL NOTICE AND DEMAND which included a 26-paragraphed "STATUTE STAPLE SECURITIES INSTRUMENT" and 6 pages of legal "DEFINITIONS" for absolute clarity, subject to 30-day review by SCOTUS as time to dispute or rebut the terms before this document went into permanent effect.

In addition, I sent to the SCOTUS "Clerk" - via "Certified Mail via USPS" a COVER LETTER fully explaining my intent to place the UNITED STATES "on notice" that I was One of the Sovereign People NOT "subject to" FOURTEENTH AMENDMENT "citizenship" slavery to the "UNITED STATES" CORPORATION; and that my CLAIMS OF DAMAGES (past, present, and future) were subject to heavy CONTRACT fees for CONSTITUTIONAL violations of my inalienable Rights as a sovereign.

3-page cover letter accompanying and explaining the "LEGAL NOTICE AND DEMAND" and accompanying "STATUTE STAPLE SECURITIES INSTRUMENT". Note that "PROOF OF CERTIFIED MAIL DELIVERY" on 1/4/12 is also included with this document.

Not only were all of the rehearings "DENIED" (as I may find those individual sheets elsewhere in the mounds of evidence boxes),; but also the SCOTUS Clerk sent back - at TAXPAYER expense - my documents of EXHIBITS as a "courtesy" with a message of ridicule in his one-sentence cover letter of 3/9/12 about the mound of evidence being "voluminous" (implying that regardless of how much evidence I might have, it will never do any good in the view of these INSURRECTIONISTS and DOMESTIC TERRORISTS).

PETITION FOR REHEARING on PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS - In Re David Schied (SCOTUS Case No. 11-5945)

SCOTUS "2nd DENIAL" on Rehearing for WRIT OF MANDAMUS - In Re David Schied (SCOTUS Case No. 11-5945)

PETITION FOR REHEARING on PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI - Schied (on behalf of STUDENT A) v. Scott Snyder, et al (SCOTUS Case #11-6015)

SCOTUS "2nd DENIAL" on Rehearing for WRIT OF CERTIORARI - Schied (on behalf of STUDENT A) v. Scott Snyder, et al (SCOTUS Case #11-6015)

PETITION FOR REHEARING on PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI - David Schied v. Ronald Ward, et al (2011) (SCOTUS Case No. 11-5937)

SCOTUS "2nd DENIAL" on Rehearing for WRIT OF CERTIORARI - David Schied v. Ronald Ward, et al (2011) (SCOTUS Case No. 11-5937)

-

CASE FILINGS FOR #4 David Schied v. MIDLAND COUNTY SHERIFF Gerald Nielson, et al (2011) (SCOTUS Case # 12-10356) --

1) EVIDENCE OF SCOTUS "DENIAL" by listing on SCOTUS website for "CERTIORARI" consideration (I am still looking for the "DENIAL" notice from the SCOTUS "clerk", but the fact that there was a "Petition for Writ of Certiorari" case number assigned without any such "Writ" instrument issued by SCOTUS - along with my "CERTIFICATION OF SERVICE" as delivered to SCOTUS - should suffice as "self-evident" DENIAL of this case by SCOTUS after it was accepted as legitimately "filed.)" -

IMPORTANT NOTE: The spelling went from "Gerald Nielson" (as originally filed in the lower "U.S. DISTRICT COURT") to "Jerry Nelson" (as "DENIED" by "Chief Judge" Denise Page Hood) by means of a criminal conspiracy between this "judicial usurper" and "Clerk of the Court" to commit an "OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE" while tainting the official record to provide "comfort and safe harbor" to the MIDLAND COUNTY SHERIFF Gerald Nielson by hiding his actual name from all future court records. Notably, Gerald Nielson "retired" from his Office just after this case was initially filed, at the end of 2012. Importantly, at each successive level of "APPEAL" to the SIXTH CIRCUIT and to the U.S. SUPREME COURT, whereby I (David Schied) attempted to "correct the record" by spelling "Gerald Nielson" correctly on my cover sheets, the "clerks" as "secondary" level "RICO" racketeers changed the name back fraudulently to "Jerry Nelson" to uphold the "predicate" RICO CRIMES OF FRAUD committed by Denise Page Hood and her criminal accomplices of her "lower court" DOMESTIC TERRORIST NETWORK. (The proof is in the EVIDENCE below.)

2) PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI

3) APPENDIX OF EXHIBITS (plus all 15 Exhibits in over 350 pages of raw EVIDENCE)