The items on this page are elements formally admitted under the Common Law to an ARTICLE III COURT OF RECORD

First is a promotional page and film industry " RESUME of David Schied " accounting for the BIOGRAPHICAL FACTS of my career in the film industry beginning in 1982, the same year that Chuck Norris personally asked me to " work out " with him and then worked me into a fight scene in his feature film , " Lone Wolf, McQuade " (which co-starred David Carradine), being also the same year I played the " sidekick " to the main character of a popular sleeper Texas film called " Last Night at the Alamo " (a local Houston bar).

Notably, ever since embarking upon a film and television career, as well as a career as a writer and author of two (self) published books - being "STREETWISE" (" An Introduction to Self-Defense ") and "SAFE AT LAST" (" The Manual for Home and Personal Security ")

- I have gone through great pains in planning for the day that, if I were to become successful as a " Hollywood stuntman " - that some tainted news reporter would attempt to dig up and report " dirt " on me in attempt to tarnish my reputation and boost his or her own at my cost. As it turned out, it was not a news reporter, but instead was a bigoted and " Woke " Michigan school district human resources " assistant superintendent " who had hired me and then immediately retaliated against me for challenging her newfound authority when she was instantly promoted to " interim superintendent " and chose incorporate " critical race theory " to make an example out of me publicly after placing me initially at the wrong level of the salary scale. (More on this below relative to " Dr ." Sandra Harris, who is now under employ of CONCORDIA UNIVERSITY.)

This is why, since the late 1970s and early 1980's I have collected ALL SORTS OF DOCUMENTATION of both my extensive exploits in the " entertainment " and book publishing industries, as well as formalized " transcripts " of my extensive education, with two BA degrees (from two differing colleges) of the UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA ("USC" where I graduated " cum laude "), teacher certification from CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY (where I earned 165 units of post-graduate class credits), a Master's degree in Education from another " top tier " of the UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN (U-M), and my work in a PH.D program - in which I pursued extensive research in common law, constitutional law, the (corrupt) history of the UNITED STATES (i.e., all THREE BRANCHES plus the " FOURTH [unconstitutional] BRANCH " of the " Administrate State "), the history of People's Grand Juries, and Private Prosecutions ... that is until the " WOKE " administrators of this " SOCIAL JUSTICE ", leftist, Marxist, Socialist, Feminist, and Anarchist " PUKE " university - otherwise known as WALDEN UNIVERSITY - shut me down and refused to allow me to continue with my solid research in these " civic engagement " areas of returning power back to the Sovereign People.

Autobiography of David Schied (still unfinished BOOK in PDF format is 1635 pages so far)

This is more than a mere autobiography, because it includes insight, history, and evidence of a lone American (as well as another " targeted " CRIME VICTIM, being a female American who is also a forensics specialist) who has been standing up for what is right against a long history of government corruption involving CORPORATE greed, seditious and treasonous FBI " agents " and high-ranking Washington, D.C. " principals " of the USDOJ, the " Federal " courts, and CONGRESSIONAL Legislators taking bribes from CORPORATE Lobbyists and corrupt, BILLION DOLLAR MEGA-CORPORATIONS and their crooked law firms. All of this history has involved the perpetuity of bureaucratic " procedural " coverup of " substantive " multi-levels of international terrorism funding and the engagement of high-stakes international art fraud.

This expansive picture book, though currently published in 1,635 pages, is fully stocked with EVIDENCE of factual news stories and other evidence pertaining to named CORPORATE and GOVERNMENT " officials " who are suspected as having long gotten away with fleecing American taxpayers and unsuspecting fine artists while engaging in many hundreds of millions of dollars of fraudulent business practices and money laundering schemes involving BILLION-dollar WALL STREET mega-corporations engaging in high-stakes crimes. Many of these people are still holding prominent positions in government and WALL STREET corporations to this day.

PART ONE (Chapters 1-6 as pp.1-222) - THE COVERUP OF NATIONAL AND INTERNATIONAL ART FRAUD WITH LINKS TO THE ITALIAN MAFIA, THE " NEW AMERICAN MAFIA ", AND THE HOLDINGS OF " MASTERPIECES " OF " ANTIQUITY " HELD BY THE CATHOLIC CHURCH AS A VICTIM

PART TWO (Chapters 7-15 as pp.223-666) - OVERVIEW and DETAILS OF WHO HAS BEEN INVOLVED IN THE FUNDING OF INTERNATIONAL TERRORISM, AND WHO IN " STATE " AND " UNITED STATES " GOVERNMENT AND ON " WALL STREET " HAS PROTECTING THEM FROM ACCOUNTABILITY

PART THREE - The " TABLE OF CONTENTS " is written as a " SUMMARY OF PARTS I AND II " (pp. 667-697) - Readers may wish to begin with this overview before digging into anything else.

Chapters 16-19 (as pp.698-1635)

PART FOUR (Chapters 20-22) - still unfinished

The BACKSTORY of why David Schied is fighting so feverishly against government corruption - This background particularly stems from overwhelming EVIDENCE of activities of EXECUTIVE and JUDICIAL " branches " of government officials from various COUNTIES of the STATE OF MICHIGAN, and in the EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN, the Region of the UNITED STATES known as the SIXTH CIRCUIT, and in WASHINGTON, D.C., which ultimately has led to his being targeted for an ATTEMPTED MURDER by a consortium consisting of the FBI/USDOJ, the STATE OF MICHIGAN, and the agents of the DETROIT EDISON ("DTE") ENERGY COMPANY.

This DETAILED background of FACTUAL HISTORY was written as a 2020 personal attempt to warn the principals of CONCORDIA UNIVERSITY and THE LUTHERAN CHURCH - MISSOURI SYNOD about an " equity-minded " and " cancel-culture-minded ", bigoted, former public school superintendent fleeing criminal prosecution " Traitor " had become hired as "DEAN" of the CONCORDIA college, where this " insurrectionist " and " domestic terrorist " is in charge of training young, aspiring classroom schoolteachers. This hiring by the LUTHERAN institution of CONCORDIA was despite the EVIDENCE that " Dr ." Sandra Harris has long been at the forefront - along with many other WASHTENAW COUNTY and STATE OF MICHIGAN " leaders " - in spreading " Woke " racial hatred, the bigotry of " Critical Race Theory ", and the" secondary " criminal coverups of " predicate " RICO CRIMES against unwary (predominantly Anglo-American) " taxpayers "; and, in particular, " white male " well-educated schoolteachers, like me, who are willing to take a hard stand against the " criminal elements " being employed as LOCAL, COUNTY, STATE, and UNITED STATES " government " in America.

AMICUS IN TREATISE: INTERPRETING THE UNCONSTITUTIONAL HISTORY OF FEDERAL AND NATIONAL GOVERNANCE OF THE PATRIOTIC " PEOPLE " AND OTHER " FREE PERSONS " INHABITING THE UNITED STATES - This 304 page "BOOK", which is complete with " Table of Contents " and fully 10 pages of " Indexes " with page numbers to relevant VERIFIED American History, case law, and other significant research into the long history of American government officials doing everything in their power to strengthen their own personal and political power while castrating that of the Common American People. This COPYRIGHTED book represents years of valuable research by David Schied.

"MEMORANDUM ON RIGHTS OF (WE), 'THE PEOPLE': TO ASSEMBLE; TO LOCAL GOVERNANCE; AND TO WITHDRAW' CONSENT THROUGH STATE AND FEDERAL JURY NULLIFICATION, THROUGH GRAND JURY PRESENTMENTS, THROUGH PRIVATE PROSECUTIONS, AND THROUGH OTHER EXECUTIONS OF CUSTOMARY LAWS OF COMMERCE' In Evidence and Support of Acts of Self-Defense, and Responses to the Unconstitutional Denial of First Amendment Right to Redress of Grievances Regarding Previous"Backward-Looking-Access-to Court' Claims"

In the " ARGUMENT " section of my " BRIEF ON CLAIM AND APPEAL " that I filed to the EIGHTH CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS in St. Louis, Missouri, I wrote, " Note that all of the documents referenced within this 'Argument' show beyond any reasonable doubt that the FACTS as presented above have been repeatedly submitted to previous 'courts' and 'judges' owned and/or operated and licensed by the 'CO-TRUSTEES' calling themselves the 'STATE OF MICHIGAN' and the 'UNITED STATES'. These are cases in which proven FRAUD - in its various 'affirmative' forms of gross misrepresentations and/or gross omissions have dominated 'backward-looking-access-to-court' cases causing not only a convoluting of the underlying ISSUES of each case, but also a compounding of the DAMAGES. For these and other 'reasonable causes' stated throughout this 'BRIEF ON CLAIM AND APPEAL', all of these previously submitted "Arguments" - as well as their plethora of 'Appendixe[s] of EVIDENCE' and their 'Table[s] of Authorities' - to include all of the dated and unrebutted Affidavits and Declarations and Video Documentaries containing supported Witness and Victim Testimonials - of verifiable STATEMENT[s] of FACTS and HISTORY, the well-researched, scholarly Memorandum(s), Amicus/Treatise, etc. and their respective references to various other Arguments and Authorities - are incorporated within this ARGUMENT as if reiterated again herein verbatim ."

In a footnote on that first page of this Argument, I also wrote, " This includes the scores of 'backward-looking' case histories, the researched 'History of the UNITED STATES', as well as the referenced autobiographical histor[ies] of David Schied as referenced above, published publicly on the World Wide Web. It also includes numerous other video documentaries produced by more Sovereign American People through Common Law means depicting numerous CRIMES by the DEEP STATE 'powers that be', not the least of significance which is titled ' From JFK to 9/11: Everything is a Rich Man's Trick
and This video
and This video
and This video
and This video
and This video

With regard to Piersol's repeated assertion ( Doc 14 , p.27) that. . .

" We reiy on our public officials who have been entrusted with the responsibility to investigate such claims and to prosecute where appropriate. " ...

. . . it is well known that " Separation of Powers " was designed with the " responsibility of the Executive Branch to take Care that the Laws be faithfully executed ", by " initiating and prosecuting criminal cases ".

Yet time and time again, not only has such CRIMINAL gross negligence and malfeasance by the Executive Branch been demonstrated, but so too has the gross negligence and malfeasance of the Judicial Branch(es) of the STATE and UNITED STATES been FACTUALLY documented as covering up such " prosecutorial abuses "; thus, revealing compounding " abuses of judicial discretion " by the " CO-TRUSTEES " of the STATE OF MICHIGAN and the UNITED STATES (" et alia "). Such documentation has been referenced by me as falling under the doctrine of " Backward-Looking-Access-To-Court " ("BLAC") cases.

I have researched the authorities on BLAC cases and produced a 66-page " MEMORANDUM OF LAW " - which was date-stamped as " received " by the USDCEDM on 3/31/16 - that was " BASED ON THE FIRST AMENDMENT PETITION CLAUSE AND EVIDENCE OF DOMESTIC TERRORISM ". As shown, that document has been located publicly for the past five (5) years - without any challenge whatsoever,

When such " insurrection " and " domestic terrorism " by those the Sovereign People have hired with " fiduciary obligations " under the PUBLIC TRUST to " faithfully execute " their DUTIES OF OFFICE in accordance with their OATHS OF OFFICES, it is time for the " Masters " of these " public servants " to take back their sovereign Powers.

See my formalized " Memorandum of Law. . .Pertaining to 'Whether judicial 'legislation' is Constitutional'; and 'Whether judicial 'independence' authorizes 'bad' behavior'; and, 'Whether 'substantive' Evidence can be 'procedurally' stricken [or dismissed]'; and, 'Whether Evidence of a 'Pattern and Practice' of government coercion constitutes 'Treason' and/or 'Domestic Terrorism' " which was date-stamped as " received " by the USDCEDM on 11/18/15 and posted publicly this past five (5) years in my previously established ARTICLE III COURT OF RECORD without challenge or rebuttal.

This is when the Sovereign People exercise their own unique " Common Law Jurisdiction " as detailed in my previously filed " MEMORANDUM OF LAW & JURISDICTION " and my previously filed " MEMORANDUM ON RIGHTS OF (WE), 'THE PEOPLE' ".

A significant " Question " about my long history of cases - particularly those such as the one in 2016 in which I acted on behalf of the Sovereign People as a " Private Attorney General " and in this instant case where I was acting on behalf of the " UNITED STATES " government as " Relator " in a " Whistleblower " case (while prosecuting the UNITED STATES itself because it refuses to do it as " the right thing ") - is: " Whether, or to what degree, can a private individual bring an action (against the agents of the ' sovereign ') as a 'principal' acting on behalf of the 'Sovereign' People by way of 'privately prosecuting' either CIVIL or CRIMINAL allegations? "

When filing an " AMICUS CURIAE " with SCOTUS in 2010, the UNITED STATES " Solicitor General " answered this question in the affirmative, giving credence now to my position that I have every right to look after the interests - and to take action on the behalf - of the Sovereign American People as a " private " individual, and doing so in a " public " capacity. (In case the link stops working at the USDOJ, this AMICUS CURIAE can also be downloaded here .)

The SCOTUS majority ruling in this case provided the history of this case. Interestingly, the SCOTUS granted certiorari based upon the following QUESTION PRESENTED: " Whether an action for criminal contempt in a congressionally created court may constitutionally be brought in the name and pursuant to the power of a private person rather than in the name and pursuant to the power of the United States [?]"

First, the question alone should conjure bells and whistles because it refers to what amounts to an " ARTICLE I " court created by the Legislature, and NOT an " ARTICLE III " court created by the CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES, drafted by " We, The People " and Ratified by the united " States " (being the unified bodies of the People's " body politic "). For a closer look at the true significance of this, readers may wish to begin with early (1792) SCOTUS case ruling of " Chisholm v. Georgia " which led to the ELEVENTH AMENDMENT becoming ratified as the first " amendment " beyond the original BILL OF RIGHTS .

Second, although the " ROBERTSON V. UNITED STATES, EX REL. WATSON " was a CRIMINAL matter involving what amounted to an " ARTICLE I " court, the " Amicus Curiae " submitted by the " counsel " to the UNITED STATES did a good job of presenting as FACT that the Common Law practice of " private prosecutions " are very much still alive here in America, though the " powers that be " of the STATE and UNITED STATES " BARS " of attorneys and judges have been attempting to render them as antiquated and obsolete (to maintain their MONOPOLY over what should otherwise be " 'The Peoples' Courts ") -- except when it is to their advantage, as in this case.

Importantly, even the " Dissenting Opinion " written by SCOTUS " chief justice " John Roberts supports the premise, not only that private prosecutions have long been a cornerstone in America's common law history, but that anyone acting on behalf of the " government " must fully honor and comply with the safeguards of the Bill of Rights ... " otherwise the constitutional limits do not apply " as they otherwise should. He wrote, "The Constitution constrains governmental action 'by whatever instruments or in whatever modes that action may be taken,'" Lebron v. National Railroad Passenger Corporation , 513 U. S. 374, 392 (1995) (quoting Ex parte Virginia , 100 U. S. 339, 346-347 (1880)). He added, "...but the action still must be governmental action. [Yet, the " majority opinion " of the SCOTUS] rejected this understanding, concluding that Watson's 'criminal contempt prosecution' was not 'a public action' but 'a private action. ...."

Where Roberts' " dissent " from the "majority" in this case is in trying to reason that, " Our entire criminal justice system is premised on the notion that a criminal prosecution pits the government against the governed, not one private citizen against another. The ruling below is a startling repudiation of that basic understanding ." What he seemingly believes - and is asserting here - is that the " role " of the private " citizen " has no meaning whatsoever [i.e., the emphasis is on the word " citizen " as meaning a " subject " rather than his using the word " people " or " People " instead as referring to the " Sovereign " as the SCOTUS majority has interpreted this " ex rel " or " Relator " Watson to be doing with her " ROLE "].

Roberts also pointed out the irrationality of " the majority " reasoning that " criminal contempt is 'a special situation' " [citation omitted] different from other "CRIMES" because, " [T]he purpose of contempt is not to punish an offense against the community at large but rather to punish the specific offense of disobeying a court order " as if the " Court " is NOT acting on the behalf of the Sovereign American People at large. This is despite the OATHS and the DUTIES of ALL federal judges to " preserve and protect " the U.S. CONSTITUTION, which was constructed from the very beginning to " institute government ... [solely with the purpose] ... of preserving and protecting the Rights " of all Americans.

What does John Roberts and " the majority " of SCOTUS know that We, The People do not that would lead them ALL to believe that the UNITED STATES courts do NOT act on " The People's " behalf, but otherwise act upon their own behalf as if some type of a "foreign entity" to "We, The [Sovereign] People" ... one that attempts to call itself " The Sovereign " instead of us " People "? It otherwise appears that it does not matter " who " acts the role of " government ", as long as they acting as " government of, by, and for the People ". Roberts - as well as "the majority" - then, in my humble opinion, SHOULD ALL BE IMPEACHED FOR TREASON for propagating the reasoning that the GOVERNMENT SHOULD BE (in any way) " PITTED AGAINST THE GOVERNED " as written in Roberts own very words.

Other information that I have posted for well over five (5) years pertaining to the laws supporting my actions in 2016 as a " PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENERAL " in partnership with a fellow man of honor and one of the Sovereign People, Cornell Squires, can still be found today at THIS LINK , as well as HERE and HERE and HERE . [NOTE: Cornell Squires died in 2017 while still ceaselessly helping his fellow Detroiters - being poor, urban dwellers and " People of Color " - to resist the TYRANNY of the awful " powers that be " still operating as " domestic terrorists " in positions of " judges " and attorneys as all joint members of the STATE BAR OF MICHIGAN CRIME SYNDICATE , as employed solely for purposes of private profiteering in both the STATE OF MICHIGAN and UNITED STATES " courts " running amuck in the EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN.]

The Supreme value of the Sovereign People having the final say in all matters related to the any one of us operating in the private capacity, cannot be underestimated or understated. Such " final say " is ALWAYS found in the form of a GRAND JURY (in the case of CRIMINAL " PRESENTMENTS and " INDICTMENTS " regardless of who that person may be in social status or "official" (government) position; and in the form of a PETIT JURY in both " civil " and " criminal " cases.

Thus, besides what is amply provided above already, more is available on the value of the PETIT JURY as provided in 1852 by Lysander Spooner's " An Essay on the Trial by Jury ". Similarly, one hundred years later - the case of UNITED STATES v. SMYTH , [104 F.Supp. 283 (1952)] provides additional insights about the relevant history of the Sovereign People's GRAND JURIES, which augments the above reference to what Scalia wrote later (in 1992) from the SCOTUS in United States v. Williams , 504 U.S. 36 (1992).

For those who are interested in research into the tracking of the Aristocracy of the World through History linking the last two-hundred and fifty (250) years of American History to the Roman Catholic CRUSADES and the BYZANTINE EMPIRE, the KHAZARIAN EMPIRE, and the Venetian, Jewish, British, and American banking systems, then the following recent publication is for you.

How and Why the Courts and Other "Branches" of American Governance Got So Corrupted and Appear to Ignore the Constitutional Guarantees of the "Public Trust": A Compilation of the Works of Patriotic Journalists, with Additional Commentary and Evidence by David Schied